Did OpenAI solve the wrong Navier-Stokes problem?

In one line

OpenAI’s proof seems eligible for a $1-million prize—but only by using a controversial loophole

Opening excerpt

Read about how mathematicians are dealing with the AI takeover of their field in our feature here .

Two weeks ago OpenAI claimed a solution to one of the biggest open problems in math —the Navier-Stokes problem —an achievement worth a $1-million prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute. The proof ignited a powder keg of concern over artificial intelligence companies’ race to disrupt the subject.

But with the dust still far from settled, a different controversy is emerging: Did OpenAI even solve the right Navier-Stokes problem?

Generated by an internal large language model (LLM), OpenAI’s proof relies on an approach that many experts find unnatural. It solves a variant of the problem that mathematicians say is disconnected from reality and thus less interesting. In a sense, the LLM found and exploited a loophole in the framing of the question.

(Excerpted from the original; full article via the source link below.)

This story hit the Hacker News front page today (63 points / 30 comments, via scientificamerican.com). Our Tech Radar aggregates daily signals on AI engineering, backend architecture and DevOps — browse the related services and further reading below, or get in touch with our team.